🔗 Share this article

The disputed, American and Israeli-supported Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) declares it is concluding its humanitarian work in the Gaza region, subsequent to approximately 180 days.

The group had previously halted its three food distribution sites in Gaza after the truce agreement between Hamas and Israel took effect six weeks ago.

The foundation sought to avoid UN systems as the main supplier of aid to Gaza's population.

International relief agencies refused to co-operate with its approach, stating it was improper and dangerous.

Hundreds of Palestinians were fatally wounded while seeking food amid chaotic scenes near GHF's sites, primarily from Israeli forces, as reported by United Nations.

Israeli authorities stated its forces fired warning shots.

Operation Conclusion

The GHF said on recently that it was winding down operations now because of the "effective conclusion of its crisis response", with a aggregate of 3 million parcels containing the corresponding to over 187 million food portions provided to residents.

The foundation's chief officer, Jon Acree, also said the United States-operated coordination body - which has been created to help execute the United States' Palestinian peace proposal - would be "taking over and developing the system the foundation tested".

"GHF's model, in which Hamas could no longer loot and profit from stealing aid, played a huge role in bringing Palestinian factions to negotiations and securing a halt in hostilities."

Feedback and Statements

The militant group - which disputes allegations of misappropriation - welcomed the closure of the GHF, according to reports.

An official from stated the organization should be made responsible for the harm it caused to local residents.

"We call upon all worldwide humanitarian bodies to ensure that it does not escape accountability after resulting in fatalities and harm of numerous Palestinians and concealing the starvation policy implemented by the Israeli government."

Foundation History

The foundation started work in Gaza on 26 May, a week after Israel had partially eased a total blockade on aid and commercial deliveries to Gaza that continued for 77 days and resulted in critical deficits of necessary provisions.

After 90 days, a nutritional emergency was proclaimed in the Palestinian urban center.

The organization's sustenance provision locations in various parts of the Palestinian territory were managed by American private security firms and positioned in areas controlled by Israeli forces.

Relief Agency Issues

International organizations and their affiliates stated the approach contravened the fundamental humanitarian principles of non-partisanship, even-handedness and self-determination, and that guiding distressed residents into armed forces regions was intrinsically hazardous.

The UN's human rights office reported it tracked the killing of at least 859 Palestinians seeking food in the proximity to foundation locations between 26 May and 31 July.

Another 514 people were killed near the courses followed by international humanitarian deliveries, it added.

The majority of these individuals were lost their lives due to the Israel's armed forces, as per the organization's documentation.

Conflicting Accounts

The Israeli military said its forces had fired warning shots at persons who advanced toward them in a "threatening" way.

The organization declared there were no shooting events at the distribution centers and alleged that United Nations of using "false and misleading" figures from the Palestinian health authority administered by Hamas.

Future Implications

The foundation's prospects had been uncertain since Hamas and Israel agreed a halt in hostilities arrangement to execute the first phase of the United States' reconciliation proposal.

It said aid distribution would take place "absent meddling from the two parties through the UN organizations and their partners, and the Red Crescent, in combination with other global organizations not linked whatsoever" with militant groups and the Israeli government.

UN spokesperson Stephane Dujarric declared this week that the GHF's shutdown would have "zero effect" on its work "because we never worked with them".

The official further mentioned that while increased relief was entering the region since the truce was implemented on early October, it was "not enough to satisfy all requirements" of the 2.1 million population.